- Critical Ideologies: A Debate on Takfeer & Khurooj
- بر صغیر کی دینی روایات میں برداشت کا عنصر
- مسئلہ تکفیر و خروج
- جہاد ، جنگ اور دہشت گردی
- Dynamics of Taliban Insurgency in FATA
- Understanding the Militants's Media in Pakistan: Outreach and impact
- Conflict and Insecurity in Balochistan
- The Militant : Development of a Jihadi character in Pakistan
- Sabaoon-II Deradicalization Program
- After Study Hours: Exploring the Madrassah Mindset
- Education for peace and harmony
- Reconstruction of the National narratives and Counter-Violent Extremism Model for Pakistan
- Role of Post-Noon Engagements of Madrassa Students in Radical Orientation
- Promoting Inclusive and Tolerant Educational Narratives
- Islam, Democracy and the Constitution of Pakistan
- Minority Rights in Pakistan: Historic Neglect or State Complicity?
- “Creating an environment that counteracts militant ideologies and radicalism in Pakistan”
- Through Each Other’s Eyes
- The Role of Ulema in Promotion of Peace and Harmony in Society
- Critical Ideologies: A Debate on Takfeer & Khurooj
- سماجی ہم آہنگی ، رواداری اور تعلیم
- سماجی ہم آہنگی کیسے ہو؟
- اسلام جمہوریت اور آئین پاکستان
- پر امن اور متوازن معاشرے کے قیام میں علماء کا کردار
- اسلام جمہوریت اور پاکستان
- ایک دوسرے کے نظر سے
- مسئلہ تکفیر و خروج
- Media Safety in Pakistan
- تعلیم امن اور ہم آہنگی
- Regulating Broadcast Media: Challenges & Reforms
- Pakistan’s Sectarian Mire & The Way Forward
- Dialogue Pakistan 2019 report
- Pakistan’s achievements in war on terror but at what cost: a special review of the current decade
- Pakistan in changing world order
- Who Am I
- Academic and Intellectual Dialogue on Social Harmony, Tolerance and Education
- Youth Engagement in Pakistan: Baseline Evaluation and Way Forward
- Dialogue Pakistan 2020
- Strengthening Governance in Pakistan
- Youth Perspective on Society, Religion, And Politics
- Supporting the Afghan peace process: Pakistan’s position, interests and policy options
- Afghanistan as Seen from Pakistan I
- Afghanistan as Seen from Pakistan II
- Perspectives from Pakistan on Afghan peace and reconciliation 1
- Discourse with Balochistan Youth on Society, Religion, and Politics
- Perspectives From Pakistan on Afghan Peace and Reconciliation 2
- How Youth in Sindh View State, Religion and Politics
- Afghan Peace and Reconciliation: Pakistan’s Interests and Policy Options II
- Interfaith Relations in Pakistan Perspectives and Worldview of Youth in Punjab
- Pakistan’s CounterExtremism Challenge and Policy Recourse
- Afghanistan as Seen from Pakistan III
- Making Sense of Pakistani Youth How Youth in Pakistan View State, Society, Religion, and Politics
- PERSPECTIVES FROM PAKISTAN ON AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION 3
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN'S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS 3
- A Path to Peace
- Countering Violent Extremism on Campuses A Faculty-Oriented Policy Brief
- PERSPECTIVES FROM PAKISTAN ON AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION 4
- Afghanistan as Seen from Pakistan IV
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN’S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS 4
- POLICY BRIEF APRIL-JUNE, 2022
- Afghanistan as Seen from Pakistan V
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN’S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS 5
- PERSPECTIVES FROM PAKISTAN ON AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION 5
- Charter of Peace
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN'S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS VI
- AFGHANISTAN AS SEEN FROM PAKISTAN-VI
- PERSPECTIVES FROM PAKISTAN ON AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION 6
- POLICY BRIEF 2
- POLICY BRIEF October December, 2022
- Youth for interfaith harmony Newsletter 1
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN’S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS
- PERSPECTIVES FROM PAKISTAN ON AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION 7
- AFGHANISTAN AS SEEN FROM PAKISTAN-VII
- YOUTH AND THE SOCIAL CONTRACT IN PAKISTAN
- Pakistan’s Afghan perspective and policy options
- POLICY BRIEF January-March, 2023
- Charter of Peace
- PERSPECTIVES FROM PAKISTAN ON AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION 8
- AFGHANISTAN AS SEEN FROM PAKISTAN-VIII
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN'S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS 8
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN’S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS 9
- Policy Brief April- May 2023
- POLICY BRIEF Jun- Aug 2023
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN'S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS - 11
- Pakistan's Evolving Militant Landscape: State Responses and Policy options
- AFGHAN PEACE AND RECONCILIATION: PAKISTAN’S INTERESTS AND POLICY OPTIONS – 12
- TRENDLINES OF PAKISTAN'S SECURITY CHALLENGES
The ideologues of extremism and violence use selected and skewed interpretations of some of the concepts and legal rulings, tradition and history of Islam to justify their use of violence against Muslim states, their institutions and rulers and also other Muslim sects. Such interpretations are neither agreed upon by all religious sects nor do all religious scholars1 within one particular sect endorse them. For instance, the concepts of takfeer (the act of declaring a Muslim to be outside the creed of Islam),2 and khurooj (going out/ armed rebellion against the state) are widely used by militant groups in Pakistan to propagate hatred and violence in the name of religion. Amid the people’s understanding of these issues and lack of diverse information and proper guidance, such interpretations may religiously sensitize them in favour of extremist forces.
With a view to create awareness among the people about takfeer and khurooj, Pak Institute for Peace Studies (PIPS) engaged leading religious scholars from all schools of thought in academic and intellectual debates to get a consensus viewpoint on these concepts and disseminate the outcome to the people. Three daylong debates were held for that purpose in 2011-12 in which religious scholars discussed at length almost all legal and academic aspects of takfeer and khurooj in the historical and contemporary perspectives with a special reference to Pakistan’s political and constitutional frameworks.
This book transcribes the complete recorded proceedings of the PIPS debates on takfeer and khurooj including religious scholars’ addresses and the subsequent deliberations. As Urdu was the ‘decided’ language of the debates, an effort has been made to keep the original Urdu terms along with their translation to facilitate readers’ understanding. Secondly, some parts of the debates have been summarized or even deleted to avoid repetition.